Fatwa Explorer

Fatwa #4743315 June 2022Denmark

I was praying Salah in the wrong direction. Do I have to repeat my Salah?

Question

Assalamualikum Shaykh.

If someone has discovered they have been praying in the wrong direction at work,  do they have to repeat those prayers?

Answer

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.  

In principle, when one is in an area where he does not know where the qiblah direction is, he is obligated obligated to enquire the direction of qibla from a person in that area. If no one is available to give the direction of qiblah, then one may make Taharri. Taharri is to investigate and make an educated guess.  If one investigated and tried his best to work out the direction of the Qiblah (taḥarrī) and the prayer was performed, thereafter this was the wrong direction, the prayer would be valid and there would be no need to repeat the prayer. However, if one did not make taḥarrī and performed the prayer, qaḍā’ will have to be made for the Farḍ and Witr prayers and not for the Sunnah prayers.[1] 

And Allah Ta’āla Knows Best 

Ibn Aḥsan

Student - Darul Iftaa

New York, USA 

Checked and Approved by,

Mufti Ebrahim Desai.

(2021-04-08)



[1] الدر المختار, سعيد, ج1, ص435

 ( وإن شرع بلا تحر لم يجز وإن أصاب ) لتركه فرض التحري إلا إذا علم إصابته بعد فراغه فلا يعيد اتفاقا بخلاف  مخالف جهة تحريه فإنه يستأنف مطلقا كمصل على أنه محدث أو ثوبه نجس أو الوقت لم يدخل فبان بخلافه لم يجز.

البحر الرائق شرح كنز الدقائق ,رشيديه ,ج1, ص288,287

وقيد بالتحري لأن من صلى ممن اشتبهت عليه بلا تحر فعليه الإعادة إلا أن علم بعد الفراغ أنه أصاب لأن ما افترض لغيره يشترط حصوله لا تحصيله وإن علم في الصلاة أنه أصاب يستقبل خلافا لأبي يوسف لما ذكرنا …
من توضأ بماء أو صلى في ثوب على ظن أنه طاهر ثم تبين أنه نجس حيث يعيد الصلاة لأنه ترك ما أمر به وهو الصلاة في ثوب طاهر وعلى طهارة.

فتاوى محموديه,جامعه فاروقيه,ج5,ص527

Something wrong with this record?

Report a problem

This goes to whoever maintains the archive, not to Askimam.org. For a question about the ruling itself, use the link to the original above.

Sent anonymously. No account needed, and nothing identifies you.