Fatwa #556715 May 2002United Kingdom
some Salafi's accuse Imam Abu Hanifa ( Rahmatulla Alayhi ) of being a Murjia due to his stance on Imaan being seperate from Ibadah
Question
1. Please make a detailed reply giving references explaining what the Imam said in regards to the issue of Imaan and Aamaal/Ibadah and how it differred from what the Murjia sect believed 2. What is the stance of the Jurists on the issue of neglecting Salah ( or committing other major sins ) does it make one a disbeliever ? 3. You have mentioned continiously that 'the Salafi's have erred in not performing Taqleed'. The article 'Shariee Role of Taqleed' also states that Taqleed is obligatory. Therefore is the ommission of Taqleed a major sin ( bidah and deviance ) ? 4. The Salafi's say that Imam Abu Hanifa ( Rahmatulla Alayhi ) stated that 'If you find anything in the Quran and Hadith contradictory ( or more Saheeh ) to what I have stated then leave my saying and follow that'. They say based on this one should not follow the Imams but look at Quran and Hadith. Who was this statement addressed to ? was it the Hanafi Jurists who studied with the Imam or the common people ? 5. Is Imam Abu Hanifa ( Rahmatulla Alayhi ) from the Tabieen ? Please provide references from the scholars for this stance 6. What was the position of Sheikh Ibn Taymiyah ( Rahmatulla Alayhi ) on Tasawwuf and did he himself practice Tasawwuf ?
Answer
A %2F b) There is a vast difference between the Murji'ah definition of Imaan%0D%0Aand that of the Ahlus Sunnah. Together with the belief that Imaan is%0D%0A'Testification of the heart and tongue', they also hold the belief that%0D%0A'Obedience or disobedience have no effect on one's Imaan'. Among the Ahlus%0D%0ASunnah there exist two views with regard to the definition of Imaan:%0D%0A1. The Muhaddithin as well as Imaam Shaaf'i (R.A) hold the view that%0D%0A'A`amaal (actions) are a part of Imaan.%0D%0A2. Imaam Abu Hanifah, the Ashaa'irah (according to one narration) and the%0D%0AMaaturidiyyah hold that 'A'amaal are not a condition for Imaan, meaning that%0D%0Anot carrying out 'A'amaal (e.g. fasting, salaah etc) or committing major%0D%0Asins do not render one out of the fold of Islam. The Muhaddithin and Imaam%0D%0AShaafi, despite their view that 'A'amaal are a part of Imaan, also concur in%0D%0Athis respect. Only the Khawaarij, a deviate sect, believe that perpetration%0D%0Aof a major sin removes one from the fold of Islam. By this it is clear that%0D%0Athis apparent difference of opinion is in fact literary (relating to terms%0D%0Aand words) and do not differ in the real sense.(Mirqaat Vol. 1 pg. 49%0D%0AAshrafiyyah). This literary difference, however, naturally gives rise to%0D%0Aanother that is just as inconsequential. Due to the Muhaddithin's stance%0D%0Athat 'A'amaal are a part of Imaan, they naturally conclude that Imaan is%0D%0Asubject to increase and decrease, since, A,amaal, a part of Imaan,%0D%0Afluctuate. Imaam Abu Hanifah, on the other hand, holds that the substance of%0D%0AImaan (i.e. the things necessary to bring belief in), cannot increase or%0D%0Adecrease, since Wahy (revelation) has terminated and Nabi (Sallallaahu%0D%0AAlayhi Wasallam) has left the world, but the quality of Imaan can differ%0D%0Aaccording to a persons actions. Thus good actions raise the quality of one's%0D%0AImaan while evil lowers its quality. i.e. We have to believe in the very%0D%0Asame things that Nabi(s.a.w) and his Sahaabah believed in, no more, no less.%0D%0AHowever, this does not mean that our Imaan is equal to theirs in all%0D%0Arespects. Yes, the substance is the same but the quality of their Imaan was%0D%0Agreatly superior. This is in fact the meaning of Imam Abu Hanifah's%0D%0Astatement that his Imaan was like that of Jibraa'eel (Alayhis salaam). To a%0D%0Adiscerning person it is therefor, abundantly clear that in substance, these%0D%0Atwo views are exactly the same and the apparent difference of opinion that%0D%0Aprobably arose out of a misunderstanding, inconsequential. (Sharhul Fiqhil%0D%0AAkbar li Ali Al Qari Pg. 164,165 Deoband). By these few details, the%0D%0Adifference between the view of Imam Abu Hanifah (R.A) and the Baatil belief%0D%0Aof the Murjiyah is also clear. In their belief, committing a sin, for%0D%0Aexample, cause no detriment at all to the state of a person's Imaan.%0D%0A%0D%0Ac) The issue here is not one of Taqleed, but of attempting Ijthaad-e-Mutlaq%0D%0Awithout proper qualification. Nabi (s.a.w) said: "Whoever speaks on the%0D%0AQuran without (proper) 'Ilm (knowledge), he should prepare his abode in the%0D%0AFire." (Mishkaat). This Hadith points out the severity of speaking in Deen%0D%0Awithout proper qualification. It is clear as day that nobody today possesses%0D%0Aqualifications even approaching those of the Mujtahideen of the past.%0D%0A%0D%0Ad) This statement is in fact true of all the A'immah-e-Mujtahideen. The%0D%0AFuqaha have mentioned that these statements are addressed to those%0D%0Apossessing qualifications equal to the task of determining Daleel (legal%0D%0Aproof). (Sharhu Uqoodi Rasmil Mufti of 'Allaamah Shaami). Leaving alone the%0D%0Acommon people, the Ulema of these times do not possess the necessary%0D%0Aqualifications.%0D%0A%0D%0Ae) Many eminent scholars, among them Imam Dhahabi, Ibn Sa'ad, Haafiz Ibni%0D%0AHajr etc, have considered the Imam to be a Taabi'ee. (Uqoodul Jummaan-%0D%0AEnglish Version Pg. 62 Azaadville)%0D%0A%0D%0Af) Due to lack of reference material, we are unable to provide information%0D%0Ain this regard.%0D%0A%0D%0Aand Allah Ta'ala Knows Best%0D%0A%0D%0AMufti Bilaal Cassim%0D%0AFATWA DEPT.%0D%0A%0D%0ACHECKED AND APPROVED: Mufti Ebrahim Desai