Fatwa Explorer

Fatwa #434014 October 2019Canada

barring one from entering properties off a muslim organization due to violent behaviour

Question

ASWW...

Can a muslim with the a history of creating problem with violent type of behavior can be bar from entering properties of a Muslim organization (which owned few masjids and facilities)  and preventing him to attend any events without giving him a chance of recent violent attack on an organiztion"s president ! There was no action taken on his past violent behaviour. 

Answer

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.

Brother in Islam

Your question is unclear. In order for us to answer your query, kindly clarify your query taking in mind the following:

1.     When you say history of creating problems, what is the history?

2.     What are the reasons behind the violent behaviour?

3.     What type of violent behaviour was carried out by this individual?

4.     Was this a once of occasion or are the attacks recurring?

5.     Is there a fear of violent attacks in the future?

6.     Was the any reconciliation between the parties involved?

7.     Was there any remorse or apology from the individual for the actions perpetrated?

8.     Is the organisation or any specific person the owner of the property and facilities or is it public as a musjid has to be in waqf? Are the events being held on private property?

You may email your clarification to: admin@daruliftaa.net Ref: Abdullah Noorgat

And Allah Ta’āla Knows Best

Abdullah Noorgat

Student Darul Ifta

South Africa

Checked and Approved by,
Mufti Ebrahim Desai.

Follow Mufti Ebrahim Desai’s official Twitter handle: @MuftiEbrahim

Latest Tweet:

“It may be uncomfortable to request a business counterpart who is close to you to record a transaction in writing. However, the discomfort could be worse when there is a dispute due to the agreement not being recorded. Maintain a healthy relationship by recording your transactions.”

Something wrong with this record?

Report a problem

This goes to whoever maintains the archive, not to Askimam.org. For a question about the ruling itself, use the link to the original above.

Sent anonymously. No account needed, and nothing identifies you.