Fatwa Explorer

Fatwa #394343 February 2018Saudi Arabia

Coming out of ihram without performing Umrah

Question

Assalamualaikum

We live in Madinah Alhumdulillah. Last weekend we decided to go for umrah. After doing the intention for umrah, my husband's second wife's haid started. So we booked a hotel in Jeddah. We dropped her off there and we went for umrah. Now we are back home. My question is what are we suppose to do now? I asked another mufti and he said that we would have to give damm and making up for that umrah is wajib. He also said that she is automatically out of ihraam and no need to trim her hair. So it would be one damm, right? Please clarify this matter. JazakAllah khair

Answer

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.

In principle, if a woman comes out of her ihram without performing Umrah, then it is incumbent upon her to give one Damm which should be discharged in the Haram and also make qadha of this Umrah.

The woman in reference will have to make qadha of this Umrah and also give one Damm in the Haram. The ruling of the respected Mufti is correct. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 

And Allah Ta’āla Knows Best

Anas Sharieff Qasmi.

Student Darul Iftaa

Hyderabad, India.

Checked and Approved by,
Mufti Ebrahim Desai.

________________

[1] تبيين الحقائق - ث (2/ 90)

 وَمِنْهُ ما يَخْتَصُّ بِالْمَكَانِ دُونَ الزَّمَانِ

[2]غنية الناسك:٢٦٢]

والثامن ذبحه في الحرم فلو ذبح في غيره لا يجزئه عن الذبح

[3] العناية شرح الهداية (4/ 98)

 وَالْمُرَادُ بِهِ هَاهُنَا الْهَدْيُ الَّذِي يَذْبَحُهُ فِي الْحَرَمِ بِطَرِيقِ الْجَزَاءِ عَمَّا بَاشَرَهُ مِنْ مَحْظُورَاتِ الْإِحْرَامِ كَالطِّيبِ وَالْحَلْقِ فِي حَالَةِ الْعُذْرِ ، وَذَلِكَ مَخْصُوصٌ بِالْحَرَمِ بِالِاتِّفَاقِ

[4]عمدة القاري شرح صحيح البخاري (10/ 123)

والرافضة عنده عليها دم للرفض، وعليها عمرة 

[5]کتاب النوازل :٢٣٧/١٢]

References

  1. کتاب النوازل :٢٣٧/١٢]
Something wrong with this record?

Report a problem

This goes to whoever maintains the archive, not to Askimam.org. For a question about the ruling itself, use the link to the original above.

Sent anonymously. No account needed, and nothing identifies you.