Fatwa Explorer

Fatwa #3439314 November 2015United States of America

Did Rasūlullāh Sallallāhu Alaihi Wa Sallam divorce any of his wives?

Question

One of my friend has asked a question from me to help him to find out about the bayan of MAULANA TARIQ JAMEEL SAHIB, in which he mentioned that the Prophet Muhammad PBUH had 13 marriages, in which 2 of them were divorced right after the NIKKAH happened. He really likes his bayans. But his question is, that is there any proof of his 2 marriages that were turned into divorces. Even though he has never heard of these 2 divorces since his child hood. Can you please give us source of this.  Can you put some light on this. 

I have given the YOUTUBE LINK below, in the first 3 to 5 minutes MAULANA SAHIB has mentioined this.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE0Jv4_2prM

ALLAH SWT knows the best, MAY ALLAH SWT KEEP US MOVING TOWARD KHER AND AWAY US FROM THE SHERR. 

Answer

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.  

Assalāmu ῾alaykum wa Rahmatullāhi Wabarakātu

The following four women were married to Rasūlullāh Sallallāhu Alaihi Wa Sallam and divorced before consummation: [1]

  1.  Mulayka bint Kaab [2]
  2.   Fatima al-Aliya bint Zabyan al-Dahhak [3]
  3.  Asma bint Al-Numan bin Abi Al Jawn  also known as Jawniyya[4]
  4.   Amra bint Yazid[5]

 And Allāh Ta῾āla Knows Best 

Jibran Kadarkhan

Student Dārul Iftā

Mauritius

Checked and Approved by:

Mufti Ebrahim Desai

[1]

طبقات ابت سعد:ذكر ازواج النبي صلى الله عليه و سام،(8/58-52 ،مكتبة الخئجى بالقاهرة)

التاريخ الطبرى(2/214,دار الكتب العلمية)

فتح البارى :(9/408,دار الحديث القاهرة)

[2]   (Al-Tabari v: 39 p: 165 , Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d v:8 p: 154)

[3]         (Al –Tabari,v: 9 p: 128, Tabaqah Ibn Sa’d v:8 p:153)

[3]         (Fathul Baari ,v: 9, p: 408, Ibn Hisham p: 918,  Al-Tabari v:9 p: 139, Ibn Sa’d         v: 8 p:153)

[4]     ( Ibn Ishaq p:55 ,Ibn Hisham p:918, Al –Tabari,Ibn Sa’d v: 8 p: 100-101)

Seeratul Mustapha: abriged, p:600

Something wrong with this record?

Report a problem

This goes to whoever maintains the archive, not to Askimam.org. For a question about the ruling itself, use the link to the original above.

Sent anonymously. No account needed, and nothing identifies you.