Fatwa Explorer

Fatwa #32427 August 2000Pakistan

Currency for Commission

Question

Due to currency limitations imposed by the government, thepractice of taking out foreign currency on passports and selling it forcommission has become quite common. Explain the Sharée viewpoint of this.

Answer

The currency limitations imposed by the government on travelers%0D%0Atraveling abroad, has no Shar%E9e basis. According to the Shari%E1h, a person%0D%0Atraveling abroad is at liberty to take along with him any amount of%0D%0Acurrency. Therefore, it is permissible for a person to take out foreign%0D%0Acurrency on his passport for another person as a favour.%0D%0A%0D%0AIt is not permissible to take a commission in lieu of this favour. Islam%0D%0Aencourages brotherhood and sacrifice. Charging commission for a favour is%0D%0Aagainst the spirit of Islam. Since the common practice is that the%0D%0Acommission IS IN LIEU of the right of taking out currency on the passport,%0D%0Atherefore, any reasoning in an attempt to justify its permissibility is%0D%0Aagainst the reality of the situation.%0D%0A%0D%0AHowever, permissibility will occur in the instance where the passport holder%0D%0Ahimself purchases the currency. Thereafter, once this transaction is%0D%0Acomplete, he may in turn sell it to a person requiring the currency. This%0D%0Asale maybe at a profit. Here it is permissible since you are selling the%0D%0Aactual foreign currency. However, just to charge a commission for taking out%0D%0Athe currency is not permissible, as mentioned above. It however should be%0D%0Anoted that the practice of taking out currency on another person's passport%0D%0Ais against the law of the land and if caught, one can be put into a%0D%0Adisgraceful situation. Therefore, it is discouraged to engage in such a%0D%0Apractice, since a Muslim should not expose himself to position of disgrace.%0D%0A%0D%0AAnd Allah Taala Knows Best.%0D%0A%0D%0AMufti E. Desai%0D%0A%0D%0A
Something wrong with this record?

Report a problem

This goes to whoever maintains the archive, not to Askimam.org. For a question about the ruling itself, use the link to the original above.

Sent anonymously. No account needed, and nothing identifies you.